Inovazone

It suddenly strikes me that I haven’t been blogging much recently. Exams finished several weeks ago but I have been somewhat busy.

In particular I’ve been working on a new site for a client, Inovazone. In the words of the site’s inventor, Alastair Darwood:

How does an invention go from a scribble on a page to a world-changing product that advances humanity? The answer is that at the heart of the invention there lies a set of distinct and crucial necessities that the invention is addressing … Until now, the only way in which necessities were discovered was through large companies carrying out expensive research, or a spark of genius from someone who suddenly sees one and thinks of a solution. Inovazone is designed to change this. The idea is that users of the site post their ‘necessities’ (short explanations of problems, ‘necessities’, they think need to be solved to benefit them (or humanity)), or rough outlines of inventions they would like to see and anyone can browse the necessities if they want to and look for interesting problems to try to solve through innovation. This could be in the form of an invention or simply a quick online response to the post on our comments system.

Interestingly enough, there doesn’t actually yet exist a site or system available to the general public that serves this particular function by providing a framework within which ideas for inventions are openly submitted and accessed, so I agreed to work on it, especially considering the core of submitting and displaying necessities is a relatively simple PHP/SQL project.

Submitting a necessity. Click to embiggen

What I found particularly compelling was that, according to Alastair, everyone with whom he’s discussed the site has expressed enormous enthusiasm for it, and even a seasoned inventor he’d talked to had described the idea as long overdue and predicted huge success. Although I originally liked the idea and somehow felt it would do pretty well owing to its novelty, I for some reason assumed one would obtain mixed reactions in discussions.

Original image at http://rockstartemplate.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/social-bookmark-icon.jpg

In terms of the hard sell, we’re employing several different methods to publicise Inovazone. We’ve created a Facebook fan page and a Twitter account – feel free to follow us (@inovazone). One.com also kindly provide adwords coupons so with some SEO we might be able to appear in ads on relevant Google searches.

The site is currently about to go into beta testing. From wiki:

Beta testing comes after alpha testing. Versions of the software, known as beta versions, are released to a limited audience outside of the programming team. The software is released to groups of people so that further testing can ensure the product has few faults or bugs. Sometimes, beta versions are made available to the open public to increase the feedback field to a maximal number of future users.

The idea of this is simply to fine-tune what we already have rather than to add more features, though both these are desirable outcomes from this round of testing; though for me personally the primary objective is to see whether the system works well with a large user base. So for that to happen we need some willing volunteers to go test out the site: anyone reading this is welcome to join the test group. Go ahead and post as many necessities as you deem reasonable, and comment on existing ones. Try out creating new subcategories and send us feedback about features that you think should be created or made better via the awesome uservoice-powered feedback utility. I’m especially interested in bugs and vulnerabilities you find; if you somehow work out how to delete posted necessities or spam the site with adverts, or if the site spews out a series of errors while you’re using it under normal circumstances, get in touch (there is a contact page). Chances are the database will be reverted to its initial (more or less empty) state before the site is released in a few weeks’ time, so disasters should be recoverable.

Before you (readers) go, I’d be interested to hear your feedback on the idea of the site – do you think it has potential? Will it be useful?

That’s all from me for now. The site will get a working and hopefully regularly-updated blog pretty soon for general status information and news so you probably won’t be hearing much more about it from me.

๏̯͡๏﴿

Songbird v Foobar

Interestingly enough I switched away from iTunes 7 and haven’t touched it ever since their highly hyped update to 8. I switched to foobar2000 which is actually a pretty awesome bit of software. I have however been constantly hearing about Songbird and its amazing features so I’ve now finally got round to installing it and testing it out. Here are my thoughts.

Foobar > Songbird

One of the reasons I switched away from iTunes in the first place was obscene memory usage. I’m not sure how iTunes 8 is with memory but I had many grievances about the performance of iTunes 7 when I used it. Testing Songbird on a decent laptop (3GB RAM, Intel Core2 Duo T8100 @ 2.10 GHz, a processor that benchmarks faster than most in its clock speed range), it took 5 seconds for the program to start up fully while foobar loaded instantly. Foobar’s memory footprint was absolutely miniscule at 10MB while Songbird required a hefty 80MB, though that’s fairly unsurprising considering its capabilities as a browser.

In terms of usability, as a foobar2000 user, I miss features like Cursor Follows Playback (and more importantly Playback Follows Cursor), complete ID3 tag control, advanced syntactical filters and fully customisable shortcut keys, for which I have yet to find Songbird extensions. Whatever the case these are minor concerns and are bound to be ironed out / provided in the long run by extensions or built in natively. However my concern is that Songbird seems directed more at less savvy / control-freak users who don’t necessarily want to use something like a RegEx string or SQL query to perform operations or filter their music – the functionality is based more around forms and buttons rather than console, debug window and command prompt. While most people probably welcome this user-friendly approach, I personally enjoy the ‘hackability’ and almost complete controllability of foobar. Of course, since Songbird is open-source a real hardcore user may prefer to hard code in mods, though I for one prefer not to have to recompile software to make it do what I want.

There are also several components which come natively with foobar (or as pre-installed plugins) such as ReplayGain (very important; Songbird’s equivalent is the ‘VolumeProfiles’ addon); minimise to tray (again critical [to me]; Songbird has the ‘MinimizeToTray’ addon); and a ‘resume playback after restart’ option (a nice touch to foobar; Songbird has an addon called ‘last track resume’).

This demonstrates the syntax of a Foobar preference element - a lot of the preferences are like this. There's just so much control

You can even control exactly what text is in the window title, status bar and system tray tooltip

Songbird > Foobar

Enough nitpicking. Songbird really does have some really awesome features. Its integration with the web is very nciely done – I get the impression more or less every online music service is supported to some extent, and the whole browser integration is a brilliant idea. Foobar’s web integration comes in the form of ‘freedb’ which I assume is some sort of tags downloader though it’s never given me any vaguely sensible suggestions so isn’t very good. There’s also a mini player built in which foobar doesn’t seem to have without resorting to skinning. Ratings are native which foobar is critically missing – you have to use ‘quick tagger’ [addon]. The default iTunes interface was offputting at first but the browse library by artist/genre/album etc at the top is another feature foobar lacks but Songbird has. And, of course, Songbird is open source.

It’s interesting that Songbird was developed as an open source project thus appealing to the techies while also being amazingly pleasant to use with some of the most useful and critial features built in and vast extensionability. Someone commented Songbird is like the Firefox of media players. I can’t say I disagree.

I find the way they've built a media player around a browser quite cool and certainly in line with the whole web integration thing

Songbird has a clear iTunes-like interface and the mashTape (web integration with artist/song info, reviews, even youtube) is a pretty cool feature IMHO

Songbird, Foobar > iTunes

Despite a slow load time, Songbird wipes the floor with iTunes when it comes to performance. There was a problem with iTunes 7 in which scrolling through a large library was a misery owing to the intense slowness of just about everything. Songbird on the other hand is actually pretty snappy. And of course Foobar runs like lighting.
Both are extensionable. I know there are iTunes addons etc. but both these alternatives take extensionability to a much higher level. Songbird probably uses extensions about as much as Firefox while Foobar takes extensionability to an extreme by more or less requiring them to function normally (hence the pre-installed ones).
And of course neither associates itself with a store that sells DRM music So it’s all good.

Overall, based on my experience of them so far, both are far more than adequate replacements for iTunes (unless you’re a fool and actually use the iTunes store in which case your music is useless if played by anything but Apple products). Foobar even has support for iPods (not sure about Songbird). Neither has performance issues, and both are more or less customisable enough for the standard user. If you’re after an easy and pleasant-to-use player with an automatically decent-looking interface with truly wonderful web integration, go download Songbird. If you’re a control-freak in search of hackability and control almost to the extent of writing your own RegEx (and also a completely no-nonsense player), foobar’s the one for you. On the other hand if you want a program that is slow, memory-hogging and defaults to buying music from a store with hideous DRM, go ahead and download iTunes.

๏̯͡๏﴿

Techie’s Take on Snow

White grass?

I don’t think there’s anyone out there who needs to be told that the UK ground to a halt today thanks to a freak downpour of snow. But I think some of the stuff that happened today was actually a great metaphor for the current status of technology in the UK as a predominant part of virtually everyone’s daily life, a phenomenon that I hope will flourish in the future.

Denial of Service

Slashdot and Lifehacker tend to inflict DoS attacks on websites and webapps whenever they feature them simply owing to the sheer traffic generated. This morning several sites began to have problems due to similar reasons: thousands of commuters simultaneously looked out of the window, smacked their heads and immediately tried to find a way to get to work … using TFL, subsequently causing the route planner to slow to a crawl for a few hours. The school intranet also managed to get DoS’ed from all the 900 Paulines attempting to discover whether the wonderful terrible rumours of school being snowed off were true. I suspect this reflects the current trend in general load balancing (including non-techie things: apparently electricity usage peaks just after some TV show ends in the UK owing to kettles being put on) and the clear necessity to move computing power to the so-called ‘cloud’ where it can take the strain of flash-flood traffic.

'The Lifehacker Effect' occurs when a site goes down owing to overload from traffic emanating from a Lifehacker post

Social Websites

The majority of Paulines used Facebook as their primary source of information regarding the school snow-off. Sitting there watching my Facebook feed reload every few seconds, I couldn’t help but notice that virtually every wall post, status update and note seemed to be asking and/or confirming rumours about school being snowed off. Twitter was also buzzing with activity which concluded with a jubilant remark from @the_unnameable:

No school. Yipppppeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

Eventually intelligence was obtained from the few people who had managed to contact the apparently grumpy porters by phone (and of course sons of teachers) and information was seeded in the form of status updates on both Facebook and Twitter which spread virally and reached most people. Of course, this merely illustrates the increasing reliance on the web for up-to-date information and the power of viral marketing (well, spread of information). As a sidenote, David Smith, a teacher at the school with the foresight to see what is needed, has created a Twitter account for one-way updates from the school: @stpaulsboys.

And of course, since the school was closed for the sake of safety and preventing us from having to brave the weather, everyone was out and about, efficiently organising events through Facebook, Twitter and mobile phone.

Social Website Logos

Cameras

Of course, every such event is a photo op. There was a point when digital cameras were associated exclusively with Japanese tourists, but today during a photography outing with George, virtually every person we saw who wasn’t building a snowman was pointing a camera at something (often with flash still turned on *sigh*). In the age of twitpic and flickr, digital cameras have become day-to-day objects embedded into just about everything which are used as a means to record moments of one’s day. If this had happened just a few years ago, I don’t think anything like the number of cameras I saw today would have hit the streets, as the idea of having to record every precious last moment of one’s life on an SD card hadn’t quite caught on.

My Flickr Photostream

Personally, I ended up with a pretty cool collection of photos (including some of Doc Mayfield & co. having fun), a new way of getting school updates (@stpaulsboys), the beginnings of a raging cold, a free Sodexho school lunch and confirmation that school is off tomorrow as well.

John Colet Statue looking rather cold

Failbook

Since Facebook had a … facelift, it has become the talk of the town among my Facebook-oriented social groups, and it appears to have received quite a lot of angry fire from furious users who have become disoriented by the changes. I personally think in terms of usability Facebook has improved, however there are still several huge problems which are beginning to turn me away from Facebook.

1. Facebook attempts to do everything. It is an amalgam of all sorts of different social networking services which at first sounds fantastic but actually ends up really quite a mess. My philosophy on social networking is that each site serves a single purpose and serves it very well; an example of such a site is Twitter – it’s for status updates and it works pretty damn well, even from text and other non-web interfaces. Facebook on the other hand attempts to incorporate status updates with notes (a sort of excuse-for-blogging concept), links (sort of mimicking Pownce), photos (imitating Flikr), groups and networks, events and private messaging all rolled into one enormous bundle, and even more ‘applications’ can be added. This used to be a huge problem as to get to someone’s wall one had to scroll past ‘Hatching Eggs’, ‘Top Friends’, ‘Compare People’, ‘Superlatives’, miscellaneous flash games and all sorts of other rubbish. Fortunately the new layout circumvents this annoyance, although nonsense with invitations like ‘xyz thinks you are gay – add Facebook Gay Application Version 2.4 to return the favour’ (??) still goes on in bulk.

2. Ajax/javascript etc. I presume the auto-complete when searching and Facebook chat are based on Ajax or something similar, and it simply doesn’t work half the time. The number of times I’ve started searching for a person and ended up having to refresh the page just to get that drop down menu exceeds my tolerance thresholds and I just end up giving up and doing something else. I can’t stand working with a site that doesn’t work. Plus the site loads unnecessarily slowly.

3. Facebook Chat. Socially awkward. Incompatible with Pidgin (last time). Breaks a lot. Distracting when in the middle of doing something on Facebook. Pure evil.

4. Facebook messaging. Bulk messaging is a complete mess and there’s no way to opt out of a spam thread which contains many people all spamming you – you just have to sit there and watch your emails pile up. Even unfriending and blocking them lets them spam you for 30 days.

5. Privacy. Facebook, with its reputation for refusing to delete users from their database and vulnerabilities to maliciously coded applications, is possibly the most anti-privacy website around; it is the antidote to anonymity. The fact that they refuse to delete information on anyone is just incredibly unnerving, and the possibility that Mark Zuckerberg will in the distant future have access to my entire online social history is disturbing to say the least.

Facebook is definitely useful, but I’m beginning to drift away from it. If I want to share links I’d much rather use Digg or StumbleUpon or Pownce than a system in which the link will be quickly buried under a sea of spam application invites, fan page joins and other people’s wall posts.